Showing posts with label dinner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dinner. Show all posts

Adventures in spontaneity

This Wednesday, I had a chance to practice being spontaneous. A friend from my now twice-weekly knit/crochet group texted me saying "Feeling knitty? Wanna meet at XX Deli for dinner and yarn?"

Wednesday is, of course, my Zumba class. I had been planning to go and shake my thang. But this girl had come to our newest group up near my place the night before, so I thought I should probably return the favor and drive down to hear get-together. So I rode my bike instead of shaking my bootie, and went to the deli.

It was really fun, but let me tell you, it stressed me out to no end. I had to navigate changes to my eating and my exercise routines (oh, the horrors!) on the same day with basically no warning.

I got to the deli--I had never heard of the place before, but apparently it's some sort of a chain--and had another freakout. The menu was huge. I had no idea what to pick. To make things even more interesting, they had a "Light 'N Healthy!" menu. Not ordering the so-called "healthy" or low-cal, low-fat items still stirs tremendous guilt and anxiety. I mean, what are the people behind the counter going to think of me when I order something from a different section?!? If one section of the menu is "healthy," then the other is (presumably) not healthy. Or less healthful. Or whatever.

I was anxious to begin with, and then I had to figure out what to order and all of a sudden, I found myself at the front of the line. So I ordered off the "Light 'N Healthy!" menu. I was literally like a deer in the headlights. I froze. The one little section of the menu at least narrowed down my choices to something manageable. By the time I got the sandwich, the side, and the free frozen yogurt (free froyo? Why yes, I think I will), it was probably equivalent to a "normal" dinner. The sandwich was pretty good, all things considered.

I have mixed feelings about how the evening went. On the whole, it was probably positive. I did something spontaneous. And social. I switched things up. The anxiety, however, was a pretty big sticking point. I know I shouldn't have ordered off the diet menu. That the decision (to go to the event, or what to order off the menu) shouldn't have sent me into panic mode.

I hate that things like this are still so stinking hard. I'm doing better, so much better, in a lot of ways. But having to make snap decisions and do things outside the norm still cause ridiculous amounts of anxiety.

"The Usual"

I am once again on the road for my freelance job (meeting to go to this morning- I left my place last night, spent the night in a nice hotel with crap Internet access), which means facing the task of eating on the road. I knew that I would need to eat dinner at about the halfway point of my 4.5 hour drive, seeing as I left at 5pm. I had found a craft store to pick up some yarn at the halfway point (I feel ridiculously oblique writing this, but I'm really paranoid about privacy since I use my real name), seeing as the store by me was all out of the one color that I needed, so I figured I would eat after I got my yarn.

Which I did.

I was going to go to Panera, since it's a pretty "safe" choice AND one where I know I could meet my meal plan requirements without flipping out. But en route from the craft store to Panera, I saw the sign that Moe's Southwestern Grille had recently opened. We have a Moe's by me, and it's a favorite of mine and my parents.

I have my "usual" that I get when I go. It started as a way to use a coupon or some other deal, and I really liked it, so I kept ordering it.  It's pretty much my default when I go. I don't go to Panera that much, so I didn't have a default decision.

The more I thought about it, the more I realized that one of the reasons I really wanted to go to Moe's was because there was a default. I didn't have to decide and calculate calories and things like that. I could just order and pretend I was sort of human instead of agonizing over the menu for half an hour and then spend the next little bit filled with gut-gnawing doubt that I had ordered the "right" thing.

It's hard to explain to someone who doesn't have an eating disorder, exactly how hard restaurants and ordering can be. I don't really have food fears anymore. I'm a little wary at the idea that I don't always know exactly what's in my food, but generally I'm over that. I can deal with it just fine, even if it isn't my favorite idea. For me, the anxiety is over having to decide what to eat from a vast array of options. I find it totally overwhelming.

So that's why I wanted to head to Moe's with my "usual."

Don't get me wrong- I loved my dinner and am glad I ate there over Panera, all other things being equal. But it made my life so much easier to just order without looking at the menu and second-guessing myself. I am that much of a creature of habit. I didn't even think to order anything else. And it was nice to be on my own and eat a complete restaurant meal by myself and not have a total breakdown.

Maybe that's part of the function of "safe foods." It's not just that they're generally lower calorie or whatever, it's also that they help limit our choices when things get overwhelming. Options are a good thing--really, they are--and I'm definitely glad that I've tackled my fear foods. But it also helps for me to have something to order when I can't make up my mind, too. That I can default to XYZ and meet my nutritional needs and also find a pressure release valve for my anxiety.

Does that make any sense? Do any of you do this, too? Please share in the comments, but also try to be mindful not to be too specific about foods and calories lest things get competitive or triggering. I want my blog to be a safe place!

My first drive thru

When I was driving home yesterday after one of the most non-ED-related mentally grueling days I've had in a long time, I had to stop for dinner. I was tired. And cranky. And had spent Lord only knows how many hours sitting in traffic the last few days, and I was cruising along well down a major interstate. I was petrified that I was going to hit (yet another) traffic snarl.

Yet the fact remained: it was dinnertime.

So I did something unusual. I pulled over at the next exit to the Chick-fil-A* and went through the drive thru. I realized, as I placed my order, that I was 31 and had just ordered my first drive thru meal. I've ordered beverages at a drive thru plenty of times, but never an actual meal. I've ordered fast food in the actual restaurant as well, also on my own, but again, not the drive thru.

Let me give this a bit of context. Drive thrus were illegal in my hometown because they were deemed a safety issue (eating and driving). They have a point there- I feel horribly guilty for eating and driving yesterday, but it really couldn't be avoided. I really don't like ordering stuff out (it has nothing to do with food and everything to do with my fears of talking to strangers. Apparently, you can be 31, have never eaten from a drive thru and also have an overblown case of stranger danger. Sigh), and since I've been on my own, I've pretty much had an eating disorder. Diet Coke, fine. Actual food, not so much.

But I guess all of that changed yesterday. I got crumbs on my lap and grease on my fingers and I survived. I didn't like it, and I survived. I much prefer eating dinner when I'm not behind the wheel, but I also think the dangers of not eating outweighed the dangers of eating and driving.

So that concludes the tale of Carrie and her First Drive Thru.

Random story postscript: Doing this blog post reminded me of my undergraduate advisor and a story she told me when we were at a conference. She was originally from Taiwan, and when she first moved to the US to start her PhD, her English was pretty limited. She said that for the first week or two she lived in America, she ate dinner at McDonald's every night because you can order by number and she knew she could count to ten. Now, whenever I have to order a menu item by number, I think of her. She was a really neat person.

*As a family, we rarely ate fast food and still really don't. I generally don't like a lot of fast food places, but I do enjoy me some Chick-fil-A. My RD made me to food exposures at all the major fast food chains so I know I can eat there, but still.

Frozen dinners prevent eating disorders?

A recent magazine ad stopped me in my tracks. This ad didn't have over-sexualized images of women, or any anorexic-looking models. This ad--for Stouffer's frozen meals--had an average teenage girl just sort of sitting there. It was the copy that got me thinking. Some pictures of the ad: The photos aren't the best quality, so the top image says "Can you give your daughter a better body image by setting the table?" The bottom image says "Studies show that teen girls who have family dinner 5 times a week are 33% less likely to develop eating disorders. "

Ohhhhh...so that's why I have an eating disorder! My mom never served Stouffer's!

I got thinking about the ad a little more, and everything that it implied. My first step was to look up the study itself, which was published in January 2008 in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine under the title "Family Meals and Disordered Eating in Adolescents." The study, led by Dianne Neumark-Sztainer at the University of Minnesota, found that regular family meals (5 or more per week) were associated with a one-third reduction in extreme disordered eating behaviors five years later, even when sociodemographic characteristics, body mass index, family connectedness, parental encouragement to diet, and extreme weight control behaviors (at the time of the first survey) were accounted for. Neumark-Sztainer divided disordered eating behavior into two groups--extreme and less extreme--and defined them as follows:

Disordered eating behaviors assessed included unhealthy weight control behaviors (extreme and less extreme), binge eating with loss of control, and chronic dieting. Unhealthy weight control behaviors during the past year were assessed with the question "Have you done any of the following things in order to lose weight or keep from gaining weight during the past year?" (yes/no for each method). Responses classified as extreme weight control behaviors included (1) took diet pills, (2) made myself vomit, (3) used laxatives, and (4) used diuretics. Responses classified as unhealthy (less extreme) weight control behaviors included (1) fasted, (2) ate very little food, (3) used food substitute (powder/special drink), (4) skipped meals, and (5) smoked more cigarettes.
Several questions I had that weren't addressed in the paper: although the study factored in disordered eating behaviors at the time of the first survey, I didn't see any relationship mentioned between disordered eating behaviors at the second survey and rates of family meals. My thought is this: the period of adolescence which the study was examining is marked by an increase in disordered eating behaviors. Which is why they chose to study teens of this age in the first place. But if teens developed disordered eating between the first and the second survey, could that have resulted in a decrease in family meals at time two (because the teen is avoiding eating)? Avoidance of meals is so common in people with both disordered eating and eating disorders that I have to wonder if the connection could run both ways. Also, mealtimes may be more chaotic in families with a genetic predisposition to eating disorders and/or disordered eating (although I'm not sure that anyone has measured that).

The interesting differences (however quibbling they might seem to be) between the ad copy were that a) the study never measured body image at all and b) the study assessed disordered eating behaviors, not clinical eating disorders. The first difference just seems like sloppy research to me: no one bothered to read the full study completely. The second difference I find rather telling, because of how we tend to conflate disordered eating and eating disorders. There is probably some overlap, I'm sure, and I'm not saying that chronic dieting isn't problematic. It is. But it's different than an eating disorder. Just like dangerous binge drinking is different than alcoholism (though some binge drinkers may abuse alcohol), and measuring sad/bad moods is different than depression (most people who are depressed are in a bad mood, but if a bad mood meant depression, then humanity would be well and truly f*cked).

I'm going to be the last person to say that family meals aren't good and important- I'm guessing they were a factor as to why I didn't develop a full-blown eating disorder until I went to college. And family meals--a return to the more social aspects of sitting down with friends and family and just enjoying food--have been a major part of my healing. Disordered eating in adolescents is absurdly common, and any effort that helps prevent that is, in my mind, fantastic.

At the same time, this study isn't a "Get Out of Jail Free" card for people who do eat family meals. I know lots of people with EDs who did eat family meals, and they got eating disorders all the same. Nor is it a reason to blame yourself if you didn't eat regular meals (or didn't eat Stouffer's!) with your children and then they developed an eating disorder.

This post isn't ultimately intended to be a critique of the Neumark-Sztainer study, but rather a breakdown of what the ad actually said and what the study actually found. Still, the fact that a frozen dinner ad used this study in their ad copy rather intrigued me--I've never seen an our-product-prevents-eating-disorders ad before!

Honey...Dinner's Ready!


Today, in honor of the beginning of Eating Disorders Awareness Week, my mom and I had a wonderful sit-down dinner together. The idea of Laura Collins and the Maudsley Parents Group, the virtual family dinner is the celebration of a simple, but powerful, family meal.

With that said, I cooked a crock-pot mac and cheese. Much better than the stuff from the box. It- I don't know- actually tasted like cheese was one of the ingredients. Then, for dessert, we went out to Coldstone for ice cream. I was so torn. When I was heavily involved in anorexia, my choice was between the "sinless" sorbet and the "sinless" sweet cream. Well, tonight my friends, I sinned. I got amaretto ice cream with Oreo cookies mixed in. May the Lord forgive me.

I never understood why eating something delicious was sinful. I realize that gluttony is one of the Seven Deadly Sins, but that, to me, wasn't related to eating ice cream. It was wasting food, a continual eating to excess to display one's weath and status. That is a sin, whether it's food or not. But ice cream? If that's a sin, they may as well reserve my seat in hell now.

At least I'll have some good company.
PS- Tomorrow I shall debut the amazing, fashionable gold fork necklace.

Older Posts Home

ED Bites on Facebook!

ED Bites is on Twitter!

Search ED Bites

People's HealthBlogger Awards 2009
People's HealthBlogger Awards 2009 - Best 100 Winner!
Wellsphere

About Me

My photo
I'm a science writer, a jewelry design artist, a bookworm, a complete geek, and mom to a wonderful kitty. I am also recovering from a decade-plus battle with anorexia nervosa. I believe that complete recovery is possible, and that the first step along that path is full nutrition.

Drop me a line!

Have any questions or comments about this blog? Feel free to email me at carrie@edbites.com



nour·ish: (v); to sustain with food or nutriment; supply with what is necessary for life, health, and growth; to cherish, foster, keep alive; to strengthen, build up, or promote



Archives

Popular Posts

Followers


Recent Comments