Showing posts with label cat awards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cat awards. Show all posts

Nice try, but...

There were three articles I read this week about eating disorders that warranted a Smooshy Faced Cat Award*. Two were hideous, ridiculous, and ignorant, while the other had such irony, I had to laugh.

The first is from fashion designer Karl Lagerfeld (I have no idea who this guy is, but considering that people are falling over themselves to agree with him, I'm going to lean towards the idea that he's a fashion world bigwig) says that "anorexia has nothing to do with fashion." Which okay, fine, it really doesn't.

But that doesn't absolve you from basically forcing your models to starve themselves in order to work for you. People have been arrested for starving their employees. "How horrible!" we say. Yet that's what the modeling industry does. He justifies this by saying, "In France there are a large percentage of young girls who are overweight and less than one percent are skinny. So let's talk about the 25 percent who have a weight problem, or are overweight. We don't need to discuss the less than one percent."

First off, it's more than one percent, especially when you consider that anorexia isn't the only eating disorder. And we DO need to discuss that less than one percent, that one percent, that five percent because we're important and we matter. Dammit.

Next is the fun interview with British TV celeb Felicity Kendal. Ms. Kendal, who was best known for her in the TV show "The Good Life," calls the campaign against size zero models "a waste of time." She says that, "it was inevitable that some women would "stick their fingers down their throats" to be ultra-slim. She said politicians campaigning on the issue would do better to concentrate on more important matters."

Considering that some of our politicians have been involved in prostitution rings, I can say that they haven't been doing much concentrating at all.

She goes on to remind me, yet again, why feminism remains a crucial issue today:

"This desire to be thin has been going on for centuries," she said in an interview with The Sunday Telegraph. "Get real. That is what women do. Why did women wear corsets and keep fainting? We do it because we think it looks great. That is what we are like.

"To pretend it's because of magazines is forgetting history. People used to bleach their hair or their faces because that was the image they believed was modern."The modern image now is to stick your fingers down your throat. I don't think politicians should get involved in the debate on size zero in fashion. They should get the hospitals and education right and just leave all that other rubbish to the mothers of the children."

And, thank the Lord, you will never be the mother of any of MY children.

Many things in life are inevitable, Ms. Kendal, such as death, taxes, and spam. Yet we spend a considerable amount of time trying to avoid these things and no one says not to get involved. So get a grip. There's also the crucial difference between bleaching your hair and forcing yourself to vomit, and the fact that eating disorders are not about wanting to be thin. They are an illness.

She does have some good advice for women considering plastic surgery, however.
But Miss Kendal, who is about to star as a vain and age-conscious socialite in Peter Hall's West End revival of Noel Coward's The Vortex, also admits that she, too, is worried about ageing. "I love being where I am now," she said. "But it's where I will be 20 years from now that is worrying me."
However, she would never consider plastic surgery: "If you are going to, you should have had it done in your thirties. If you wait until you are older nothing matches."
I will keep that in mind.

Lastly, we have some advice from Valerie Bertinelli, Jenny Craig spokeswoman extraordinaire. She's been all over the press this past week or two, promoting her new book called "Losing It." Some articles that have come out have been rather interesting. One said that she admits to using cocaine to lose weight.

And then- then! She blames Gisele Bundchen for the epidemic of anorexia and supermodels. She says:

"When there were several of those models dying from anorexia and I read that Gisele Bundchen said something about it's not being the designers' fault but the parents' fault, I was like, 'Well now, wait a minute, Miss Skinny Girl. (I said), Designers do have something to do with this because they hire women like you'," Contactmusic quoted Bertinelli as telling Ladies Home Journal magazine.
So basically, Ms. Bertinelli, you should be taking Jenny Craig to task for hiring someone with an eating disorder history to sell a diet product. Fine, maybe you weren't emaciated, but using cocaine to lose weight is an eating disorder.

To Mr. Lagerfeld, Ms. Kendal, and Ms. Bertinelli, without further ado, I present you this:

*A smooshy faced cat who is old, forgetting to use the litter box, and has fur coming out in chunks. For the one person on this planet who truly understands this comment.

posted under , | 5 Comments

Building a Straw Model

I think the author of this column is taking the evidence quite out of context. On one hand, I do have to agree with the title:


Which is true- models don't cause eating disorders and there's basically no evidence that they do.

I've said before that the point of banning Size Zero models won't prevent eating disorders. And neither do I think that because it won't prevent eating disorders doesn't mean that it shouldn't be done.

The author of this column in the Times Online holds that, essentially, the main "the lardy rest of us" oppose unhealthily thin models is that we're jealous. In the second paragraph, she says:

On Tuesday morning the Today programme got Professor Susie Orbach on to warn us about something she called “beauty terror”, a concept that seems to work like this: models are very slender young women. This is a state of affairs that is probably bad for them, and a terrible affront to the lardy rest of us. Observing their ethereal beauty, we wish that we, too, looked like a wood-nymph in PVC leggings. Realising that it will never be so and feeling discontented with our lot, we reach with a sigh for the chocolate biscuits. In extreme cases, we may sick up the biscuits we have just consumed, or eschew biscuits altogether, thus compounding our discontent with an eating disorder. Worrying, certainly – but terror? Really?

You know what causes me terror? People who think they know the answer to everything without really knowing anything.
Ms. Shilling proceeds to build a straw man (straw model?) by saying that since athletes and dancers aren't required to be weighed and measured, neither should models. After all, "fashion, like other branches of the entertainment industry, is a confection of fantasy. Lucrative and important as the construction industry is, I don’t think its most passionate advocate would argue that much is expected of builders by way of fantasy."

Ah, but the whole point of ultra-thin models is, as far as I knew, that they wore the clothes better. So that really doesn't get us anywhere. Because "wearing the clothes better" doesn't quite seem like fantasy. And just because there isn't health monitoring of atheletes and ballerinas doesn't mean there shouldn't be- it just means there isn't. They are having hearings on steroids in baseball at the moment. So obviously this issue is relevant, and not just among creators of fantasy.

Even if model and fashion were an industry of fantasy, the health effects of starvation aren't a fantasy. Anorexia and bulimia aren't a costume you can just take off as soon as you exit the runway.

There is a nugget of truth to Ms. Shilling's essay: she says that it's wrong to blame eating disorders and body image woes on models themselves.

If the Government and the press, which reports the “beauty terror” debate with such gusto, really believed that models were responsible for the huge rise in eating disorders they could stop it at a stroke, by agreeing a ban of editorial and advertising images of emaciated girls. But although “blame it on the waif” makes a good soundbite, it is more complicated than that.

Which is all too true. I don't agree with her assessment of the actual problem, but it wrong to blame models and fashion on eating disorders.

Her ultimate assessment, however, consists of truly award winning stupidity:

Guiltiest of all is the vicious late 20th-century trend in food marketing that persuaded (mainly) women that they were “too busy” to cook. Delia Smith’s How To Cheat at Cookingis a perfect example of this wicked vogue. A reprise of her 1971 publication of the same title, aimed at people who “don’t want, or don’t have time, to cook”, the current volume recommends a variety of expensive, processed ingredients, and is already a bestseller.

So if we are really worried (and we should be) about our uneasy relationship with our bodies, the first step towards recovery would be for us as a society to stop blaming our collective disease on the fashion industry and admit that the problem lies not with a handful of unusually attenuated and beautiful young women, but with ourselves: our idle and stupid eating habits, and our idiotic self-delusion in believing that we could all look like models (if only models were a bit fatter and a bit uglier).

Here's a smooshy-faced kitty award for you, Ms. Shilling.

No advice is better than this...

There are many well-meaning people out there who think they have the "cure" for eating disorders. Sanjay Gupta of CNN has taken a stab at it in the past (the actual link escapes me at the moment). More recently, "Dr. Irina" has suggested a 95 day treatment program on CD that will forever cure the sufferer because

“all eating disorder sufferers have subconscious blockages and these blockages are the reason people have the disorder. Once the blockages are identified and removed the eating disorder is gone.”

Riiiiiiiiiight. You would think that if the "cure" for eating disorders was that simple, someone would have come up with it before. Listen to a CD. There ya go. ::pats on the back::

One magazine article that crossed my path had a little more detailed, though no more helpful, approach to anorexia recovery. In American Chronicle, writer Ricky Hussey* starts out promising.

"Until recently, anorexia was believed to be solely a psychological disease. Now, however, scientists and nutritionists have identified a number of physical symptoms as well, such as a zinc deficiency and a chemical imbalance similar to the one associated with clinical depression."

Okay. I can do this.

Unfortunately, that was about the only useful and indeed accurate statement in the whole article titled "Complementary and Alternative Treatments for Anorexia Nervosa." At the end of the first paragraph, Mr. Hussey** says that the sufferer should

"eat a diet high in fiber, including fresh raw fruits and vegetables. These foods cleanse the body and help your appetite return to normal. Avoid sugar and processed or junk foods, which contain no nourishment at all."

When I started refeeding in residential treatment at the end of 2005, I had horrific stomach cramps from eating an onion garnish because my system literally couldn't tolerate food that complex. And imagine the gas. Whooo! Put the matches away, kids. It's true that I would advise against eating pure sugar for anyone, let alone for someone likely to have difficulties regulating glucose levels, but I would just say to eat proteins and fats with the sugar. I have reactive hypoglycemia, so I crash if I eat carbs without some form of protein and/or fat with them. That's been true before the AN.

And calorie-dense items like "junk food" are just the sort of foods a recovering person NEEDS. I ate 2 candy bars a day for a while to help get in the amount of calories I needed. The fat and calories were essential to my recovery. Raw fruits and vegetables take up too much stomach space for a person who needs to get maximum calorie bang for the buck.

Hussey goes on, describing vitamin and mineral supplements:

vitamin B12 injections (1 cc 3 times weekly) increases appetite and prevents loss of hair; use in lozenge form if injections are not available

Which is fine, if you have a documented, severe B12 deficiency. I had a friend benefit from these injections- but she had testing done beforehand. And it wasn't to increase appetite. For starters, an anorexic will NEVER take something purely to "increase appetite." Secondly, s/he doesn't have a problem with appetite- the problem is with eating, with being so afraid of food that they are unable to eat.

It gets better. Here are some other "treatments" you can use:

Aromatherapy
To lessen anxiety and soothe the nervousness and low spirits that often accompany anorexia nervosa, aromatherapy practitioners suggest any of the following essential oils: bergamot, basil, Roman chamomile, clary sage, lavender, neroli, or ylang-ylang.

Ayurvedic Medicine
Ayurvedic practitioners worry about the lack of nourishment as well as the depression that's often associated with anorexia. They may recommend cardamom, fennel, and ginger root to help stop vomiting and improve digestion, and advise a bland, soothing diet without spices, coffee, or tea. To soothe and calm the nervous system, practitioners also may suggest massaging the head and feet with warm sesame oil.

Herbal Therapy
Try herbs that stimulate the appetite, such as ginger root, ginseng, and peppermint. Herbal products are availablein health food stores and in some pharmacies and supermarkets. Follow package for specific directions. Remember to consult your doctor before enr barking on any new regimen. Anorexia shouldn't be ignored; the disorder can have serious consequences.

Acupuncture
Acupuncture can help enhance an anorexia sufferer's general recovery by promoting feelings of well being and by balancing the body's chi, or energy levels, which have most likely been impaired by the patient's habitual self-starvation. The length of treatment will vary, depending upon the needs of the individual and the severity of her condition.

Thanks for the help, Mr. Hussey, but I think I'd rather stick to proven methods. My chi is just fine, thanks.

So I would like to award Dr. Gupta, Dr. Irinia, and Mr. Hussey (who has no health qualifications that I could find, which begs the question: who the hell is he to be giving this advice?) the Smooshy Faced Cat Award:


*I'm SO not going there with his name. I want to, however. But I will restrain myself. Have at it in the comments, however, if you're so inclined.

**It's totally bizarre to write out "Mr. Hussey." Like really, really weird.

And on a lighter note...

I found a sweet, adorable vid that shows the Smooshy Faced cat as a little kitty!

If only she knew then that she would be dealing out awards soon.



All in good time, my friend. All in good time.

posted under | 11 Comments

Supreme Ironies (or, they really don't get it, do they?)

I would like to hand out another Smooshy-faced Cat Award, this time to one of the most prestigious medical groups of our nation: the American Medical Association.

Their newest campaign against "Childhood Obesity" definitely disproves the fact that doctors are, indeed, smart. I'm sure there are a few sharp crayons out there, but the rest? It's time to buy a new box of Crayolas, kids.

This was their latest proposal: Expert Panel Says to Call Kids 'Obese'. One of the experts was the illustrious Centers for Disease Control (for whom I used to have much respect). The other was the good ol' AMA. An exerpt from the article:

Dr. Reginald Washington, a committee spokesman and member of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said Tuesday that some doctors have avoided the blunt terms for "fear that we're going to stigmatize children, we're going to take away their self-esteem, we're going to label them."


The recommended terms cut to the chase, at least medically, but don't mean that doctors should be insensitive or use the label in front of every patient, he said. "We need to describe this in medical terms, which is 'obesity.' When we talk to an individual family, we can be a little more cognizant of their feelings and more gentle, but that doesn't mean we can't discuss it," Washington said. "The evidence is clear that we need to bring it up."


Answer me this: why shouldn't doctors be aware of and respond to a patient's feelings? Why don't you ask the kid what s/he likes to eat and eats regularly, and what activities they enjoy. Hell, ask them if they're happy.

And pray tell, Dr. Washington, to what evidence are you referring?

Ah, yes. Statistics. Mark Twain said it best: There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.

Younger kids are developing Type 2 diabetes. Almost 1/3 of our children are 'overweight.'

Yet the irony is that the children with Type 2 diabetes are quite the minority, and I don't know that anyone has done a study on any possible genetic or underlying metabolic causes for this. Another question is this: are children any unhealthier now than before?

See here's the thing: people are confusing cause and effect. It's like the current debate about mercury in childhood vaccines. Study after study has confirmed no relationship between thimerosol (a preservative containing mercury) and the onset of autism. So why the debate in the first place? The onset of autism typically happens around 18 months. Which is about the same time as some childhood vaccines. Ergo, the vaccines (or the mercury) caused the autism.

Autism is a serious, heartbreaking disease. I've seen it in my relatives. Research on the causes of autism is necessary (just like it is for eating disorders). The timing of vaccination happening around the time of autism symptom onset doesn't mean that there's a causal relationship.

It's the same with so-called 'childhood obesity' and it's 'epidemic.' Just because kids weigh more today doesn't mean that they are less healthy. They are less likely to die of infectious disease. They are less likely to die in automobile accidents. Why not worry about something we know actually harms a child's health, like lack of insurance? Vaccines are life-saving. So is food. Sandy Szwarc, in her Junkfood Science blog, put it best:

"Far more young people are dying from anorexia than . . . from being fat."

This comment is coupled with an intriguing and haunting research study done by the CDC that a young person's perception of their weight (either too overweight or too underweight) drastically increases their likelihood of attempting suicide. This was NOT related to their actual weight. Rather, it was their perception of their weight that increased the risk.

Talk about speaking out of both sides of your mouth there, you CDC peeps. "Kids are too fat!" you say, yet a little itty-bitty news article says "Kids who think they're fat are more likely to commit suicide."

Solution? Tell kids they're obese. Suicide kills more teens than any type of overweight.
Pat yourselves on the back for a job well done. You have outdone the veritable Jonathan Swift on creating your own Modest Proposal.


FYI: A Modest Proposal was a short satirical essay written by Swift on the near-famine conditions in Ireland in the 1700s. His solution? Parents should eat their own children, thereby lessening their financial burden and providing sustenance.

Group Colonics, Anyone?

I could not make this stuff up. Seriously. If it weren't real, it would be laughable. It is, however, quite real.

I found this topic posted on the Junkfood Science blog (an absolutely fabulous, incredibly sane blog). Evidently, the next season of The Simple Life, socialites Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie are camp counselors at (get this) a weight loss camp.

WHAT????

"We gave the campers enemas," Richie told Reuters Monday in a brief interview given by the pampered pair to promote their show, which returns for a fifth edition May 28 on the cable network E! Entertainment Television.

Merciful Mary Mother of God. I am truly appalled. The camp directors are either ignorant, stupid, money-grubbers, or all three. I can't think of anything more irresponsible. Ditto the show. If I heard one word of this about my child's camp, they would be home as soon as I could take them.

Secondly, enemas do NOT promote weight loss. You lose water. That's it. The loss of fluids can cause dangerous drops in electrolytes and dehydration. This is stuff that kills. This kind of dehydration almost killed me.

But wait! There's more!

"We did it outside, so that was a lot of fun," Richie, 25, said of the enema sequence. "It probably wasn't that fun for [the campers], but it was definitely interesting. It was something that I never thought I would do before."
Camp director Susan Powter says that colonics are the "first step to wellness." Now, here's what is so interesting. Humans, in some form or another, have been around for around a million years. Now maybe chasing antelope didn't leave them with a lot of spare time, but I'm fairly sure that squirting water up their asses was not a part of daily life. If the Cro-Magnon peoples were into colonics, it probably would have been found in their cave paintings.

It wasn't.

Lastly, the show's producer says:

"It's probably a 10-minute sequence, which according to the producer of the show will have you on the floor laughing."
I suppose I'll never know because I, for one, will not be watching.

I will however, award The Simple Life show a Smooshy Faced Cat Award. You have totally earned it. Congratulations to all.

Older Posts Home

ED Bites on Facebook!

ED Bites is on Twitter!

Search ED Bites

People's HealthBlogger Awards 2009
People's HealthBlogger Awards 2009 - Best 100 Winner!
Wellsphere

About Me

My photo
I'm a science writer, a jewelry design artist, a bookworm, a complete geek, and mom to a wonderful kitty. I am also recovering from a decade-plus battle with anorexia nervosa. I believe that complete recovery is possible, and that the first step along that path is full nutrition.

Drop me a line!

Have any questions or comments about this blog? Feel free to email me at carrie@edbites.com



nour·ish: (v); to sustain with food or nutriment; supply with what is necessary for life, health, and growth; to cherish, foster, keep alive; to strengthen, build up, or promote



Archives

Popular Posts

Followers


Recent Comments